Skip to content

Problems with the question

The current Statistics Canada census asks the following question on religion:

There are a couple serious problems here.

A Biased Question which will Result in an Unfairly Small Measure of the Non Religious

The wording of the religious affiliation question that has been asked since 1971 is “What is this person’s religion? Indicate a specific denomination or religion even if this person is not currently a practising member of that group.  For example, Roman Catholic, Ukrainian Catholic, United Church, Anglican, Lutheran, Baptist, Greek Orthodox, Jewish, Islam, Buddhist, Hindu, Sikh, etc.”.  The respondent has the option to write in a religious denomination or select the “No religion” checkbox.

The census labels any lapsed, unbelieving and/or non-practising catholic, muslim, jew, etc, with those observant or believing members of that tradition, even though this may conflict with their actual religious worldview.  The effect this had was to drown out the numbers of atheists and agnostics in our country.

The definition of “No Religion” is too vague

The other flaw with the question is its failure to break down “No Religion”.  Why is that important?  The “No Religion” category fails to differentiate between extremely different types of non-religious Canadians, including

– atheists
– agnostics
– secular humanists
– Spiritual but not religiously affiliated
– Deists
– Those that self identify as “New Age”

See the past census results and future projections.

1 Comment Post a comment
  1. Evan Frank
    May 8 2011

    This is no surprise given the nature of the conservative party members; Harper feigns secularism while his puppets continue to promote their personal religious agendas and given that they now have a majority, there will be reintroduction of legislation to ensure that their xtian moronic fantasies will be integrated into saving Canadians. We need to actively protest such actions and be counted as those who totally reject religion. Some of our Humanist followers are so caught up in respecting everyone, they refuse to express to the believers that they are DISBELIEVERS in religion, they instead use loose terminology such as NOT RELIGIOUS which makes no statement and is a cowardly way of dealing with it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments

%d bloggers like this: